P.F. Chang's Class Action Lawsuit Settlement Reached Under FLSA
Quick View
Company
P.F. Chang’s
Problem
Alleged Labor Violation
Who
P.F. Chang's labor between November 5, 2016, and July 8, 2020, in any of the 30 specified states
Claim Deadline
October 25, 2024
Listen to the Actumo Podcast
A recent class action lawsuit against P.F. Chang's, one of the top class action settlements, has reached a settlement, bringing attention to wage practices in the restaurant industry. The lawsuit, filed under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), alleged that the popular chain restaurant with many P.F. Chang's locations violated labor laws by underpaying its servers.
The settlement agreement has implications for both P.F. Chang's and its employees. It highlights the importance of FLSA compliance for businesses and offers a potential way for eligible servers to receive compensation through a class action settlement check. This development also sheds light on how class action lawsuits, a type of open class action lawsuit, can address workplace issues and help workers get fair pay according to class action news.
Overview of the P.F. Chang's FLSA Lawsuit
Background of the case
The P.F. Chang's class action lawsuit, an FLSA class action lawsuit, began in July 2018 when three underpaid servers filed a P.F. Chang's complaint in federal court. They sought to recover unpaid minimum wages and overtime compensation, not just for themselves but for all other servers working at P.F. Chang's China Bistro, Inc. This legal action quickly gained attention as it highlighted potential wage violations in the restaurant industry, as reported in P.F. Chang's news.
Allegations against P.F. Chang's
The main accusation in this class action lawsuit centered on P.F. Chang's wage practices. Servers claimed that the restaurant chain required them to perform excessive amounts of non-tipped work, often referred to as "side work," while still paying them the lower tipped minimum wage instead of P.F. Chang's server pay. This practice, they argued, violated the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and led to wage and hour violations.
Specifically, the lawsuit alleged that P.F. Chang's:
Failed to pay the full federal hourly minimum wage of $7.25 for time spent on non-tipped tasks.
Improperly applied the "tip credit" minimum wage for all hours worked, even when servers spent more than 20% of their time on side work.
Underpaid overtime compensation due to the incorrect calculation of the regular pay rate.
The side work in question included tasks such as rolling silverware, cleaning work areas, preparing food or work stations, re-stocking, and other duties that didn't give servers the opportunity to earn tips.
Scope of affected employees
The class action lawsuit had a broad reach, potentially affecting thousands of P.F. Chang's servers, known as class members, across the country. The court conditionally certified the lawsuit as a collective action under the FLSA on July 8, 2020. This certification allowed eligible servers to join the lawsuit and assert their minimum wage claims.
The scope of affected employees included individuals who:
Worked as servers for P.F. Chang's between November 5, 2016, and July 8, 2020.
Were employed in any of 30 specified states, including Alabama, Florida, Illinois, Texas, and others.
Regularly performed side work for more than 20% of their time in a workweek.
Were paid the tipped minimum wage for hours spent on side work instead of the full federal minimum wage.
As the lawsuit progressed, more than 6,000 P.F. Chang's servers opted to join the class action, demonstrating the widespread nature of the alleged wage violations. This large number of participants underscored the significance of the case and its potential impact on the restaurant industry's wage practices.
Details of the Settlement Agreement
The P.F. Chang's class action lawsuit has reached a settlement, marking a significant development in the ongoing dispute over wage practices. This agreement has far-reaching implications for both the restaurant chain and its employees.
Terms of the settlement
After extensive negotiations, including two full-day mediation sessions with a retired judge, the parties have come to a tentative P.F. Chang's settlement agreement. The court granted preliminary settlement approval on August 15, 2024. While the exact amount of the settlement remains undisclosed due to a court-approved motion to seal certain parts of the agreement, it's believed to be a fair and reasonable offer considering the disputed issues.
The settlement addresses allegations that P.F. Chang's violated the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) by requiring servers to perform 'side work' for a tip-credited wage. As part of the agreement, P.F. Chang's will voluntarily dismiss the servers' Maryland and Pennsylvania-based wage claims.
Eligibility criteria
To be eligible for the class action settlement, individuals must have worked as servers for P.F. Chang's between November 5, 2016, and July 8, 2020, in any of the 30 specified states. These states include Alabama, Florida, Illinois, Texas, and others. Eligible servers must have regularly performed side work for more than 20% of their time in a workweek and been paid the tipped minimum wage for those hours instead of the full federal minimum wage.
Payment structure
The payment structure for eligible servers is based on a calculation performed by the plaintiffs' counsel. This calculation takes into account the date the server's consent form was filed, the hours worked that were paid at a rate below minimum wage, and the server's hours and earnings history from P.F. Chang's timekeeping and payroll records.
Each eligible server will receive a pro-rata share of the total settlement after deductions for attorneys' fees, litigation costs, administration costs, and named plaintiff service payments. The settlement payment will be reported as one-half W-2 wage earnings and one-half penalties, interest, and liquidated damages on a 1099 form.
Standard employment tax withholdings will be made from the portion of the settlement award allocated to unpaid wages. It's important to note that recipients will be responsible for paying any personal taxes owed on the settlement amount.
Eligible servers will have 120 days to cash their settlement checks. If a check remains uncashed after this period, the money will be donated to charity. Those who accept the settlement offer agree to waive and release their wage and hour claims against P.F. Chang's for damages, penalties, interest, attorneys' fees, costs, and any other amounts recoverable under the FLSA or related state laws during their employment through March 6, 2024.
This class action settlement represents a significant step in addressing wage practices in the restaurant industry and provides a potential avenue for eligible servers to receive compensation for alleged underpayment.
Legal Implications and FLSA Compliance
Fair Labor Standards Act violations
The P.F. Chang's class action lawsuit sheds light on potential violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The FLSA sets federal minimum wage, maximum hour, and overtime guarantees that cannot be modified by contract. In this case, the plaintiffs alleged that P.F. Chang's failed to pay servers the full federal hourly minimum wage of $7.25 for time spent on non-tipped tasks, improperly applied the "tip credit" minimum wage for all hours worked, and underpaid overtime compensation due to incorrect calculation of the regular pay rate.
The FLSA allows employers to pay a "tipped employee" a cash wage of $2.13 per hour, provided that the employee's tips make up the difference between the cash wage and the current federal minimum wage. However, this "tip credit" provision has limitations. The lawsuit argues that P.F. Chang's violated these limitations by requiring servers to perform excessive amounts of non-tipped work, often referred to as "side work," while still paying them the lower tipped minimum wage.
Impact on restaurant industry practices
This class action lawsuit has significant implications for the restaurant industry as a whole. It highlights the need for employers to carefully track and compensate employees for different types of work performed during their shifts. The case brings attention to the common practice of requiring servers to perform side work and raises questions about how much non-tipped work is acceptable before full minimum wage must be paid.
The settlement agreement reached in this case may lead other restaurant chains to reassess their wage practices and policies regarding side work. It could prompt a shift in how restaurants allocate tasks among staff and how they track and compensate for different types of work performed by tipped employees.
Precedent for future cases
The P.F. Chang's class action lawsuit and its settlement set a precedent for future cases involving wage practices in the restaurant industry. It demonstrates the potential for employees to collectively address workplace issues through class action lawsuits under the FLSA.
This case also highlights the importance of proper record-keeping by employers. The ability to accurately track hours worked, including time spent on tipped and non-tipped tasks, is crucial for compliance with labor laws and defending against potential claims.
The court's decision to conditionally certify the lawsuit as a collective action under the FLSA on July 8, 2020, allowed eligible servers to join the lawsuit and assert their minimum wage claims. This certification process and the subsequent settlement agreement provide a roadmap for similar cases in the future.
Furthermore, the case underscores the need for employers to stay informed about changes in labor law interpretations. For example, the court's rejection of P.F. Chang's argument based on a new Department of Labor interpretation confirms that the FLSA still requires full minimum wage payment for tipped employees who spend more than 20% of their time in a workweek performing untipped labor related to their tipped occupation.
As the restaurant industry continues to evolve, this case serves as a reminder of the importance of FLSA compliance and the potential consequences of wage violations. It may encourage both employers and employees to be more vigilant about wage practices and lead to more equitable compensation structures in the future.
Next Steps for Eligible Servers
How to participate in the settlement
Eligible servers who wish to take part in the P.F. Chang's class action lawsuit settlement need to follow specific steps. To receive their share of the settlement, FLSA Opt-in Plaintiffs must complete a release form and return it to the Settlement Administrator. They have the option to do this by email, fax, or through an online form available on the P.F. Chang's website. The online method requires using a Unique ID and PIN included in their notice. It's crucial for servers to understand that they're only eligible if they meet certain criteria: they must be an Opt-in Plaintiff in this action, have worked as a Server during the relevant time period, and have been employed in a state included in this lawsuit.
Deadlines and important dates
The most critical date for eligible servers to remember is October 25, 2024. This is the deadline for FLSA Opt-in Plaintiffs to return their release forms if they want to participate in the settlement and receive payment. It's important to note that if an FLSA Opt-in Plaintiff doesn't respond to the notice by this date, they won't receive any payment, and their claims will be dismissed with prejudice. This means they'll be barred from asserting their claims in the future.
Options for opting out
Servers who don't wish to be part of the class action settlement have the option to exclude themselves. If an FLSA Opt-in Plaintiff decides to opt out, they need to notify the Settlement Administrator by email or written letter. By submitting a valid Exclusion Letter, they choose not to participate in or be bound by the Settlement. This means they won't release any claims through this Settlement, won't be entitled to any payment, and won't have the right to appeal from or comment on the Settlement.
If a server opts out, their claims in this case will be dismissed without prejudice. This gives them the right to file a separate individual lawsuit if they choose to do so. It's important to note that their claims will be tolled for 30 days after the Court grants final approval of the settlement and dismisses the case. This allows them to file a new lawsuit without any further loss of time under the applicable statute of limitations.
Servers should carefully consider their options before making a decision. If they accept the settlement offer, they agree to waive and release their wage and hour claims against P.F. Chang's for damages, penalties, interest, attorneys' fees, costs, and any other amounts recoverable under the Fair Labor Standards Act or related state laws during their employment through March 6, 2024.
The Court has approved the distribution of a Settlement Notice, which provides detailed information on how to participate in the settlement and outlines all available options. Eligible servers should review this notice carefully to understand their rights and the potential impact of their decisions regarding this class action lawsuit settlement.
Conclusion
The P.F. Chang's class action lawsuit settlement, one of the top class action settlements, has a significant impact on the restaurant industry, shedding light on wage practices and FLSA compliance. This case highlights the importance of proper compensation for tipped employees and the need for clear guidelines on side work. The settlement not only provides potential compensation for eligible servers but also serves as a wake-up call for other restaurants to review their wage policies.
Moving forward, this case sets a precedent for future wage disputes in the service industry. It underscores the power of collective action in addressing workplace issues and securing fair compensation. For P.F. Chang's servers who meet the eligibility criteria, it's crucial to carefully consider their options and take action within the specified deadlines to protect their rights and potentially receive compensation.
The settlement also raises important questions about P.F. Chang's careers, P.F. Chang's hours, P.F. Chang's pay schedule, and the role of P.F. Chang's human resources and P.F. Chang's HR department in ensuring fair wage practices. It may prompt changes in how the company handles personnel records, employee data, and compliance with the California Labor Code and other state laws regarding non-exempt employees, meal and rest periods, itemized wage statements, and split-shift premiums.
Furthermore, the case draws attention to the ongoing UKG lawsuit and UKG settlement, which involve similar wage and hour violations and the use of litigation hold notices. It underscores the importance of the Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) in empowering employees to hold California employers accountable for labor law violations.
In conclusion, the P.F. Chang's class action lawsuit settlement represents a significant milestone in the fight for fair wages in the restaurant industry. It serves as a reminder of the power of collective action and the importance of staying informed about one's rights as an employee. As the legal landscape continues to evolve, it's crucial for both employers and employees to stay vigilant and work towards creating a more equitable and compliant workplace.