Class Action Lawsuit Claims Subway Sandwiches Lack Promised Meat
AI Generated Image
Listen to the Actumo Podcast
A new class action lawsuit against Subway restaurants, part of the popular fast-food restaurant chain, claims their sandwiches like the steak and cheese sandwich contain significantly less meat than advertised to customers on the subway menu. The legal action alleges that the sandwich chain misrepresents the amount of protein in their subway food products, potentially affecting millions of customers across the United States who pay high subway prices. This lawsuit raises serious questions about food advertising practices, misleading advertisements, and consumer rights.
The case highlights several important issues for fast-food consumers and the restaurant industry. Subway faces scrutiny over their marketing claims, product specifications like meat quantity, and customer satisfaction guarantees. Customers who purchased Subway sandwiches during the specified period may qualify for compensation through this legal action, adding to the chain's previous legal challenges regarding food quality and advertising practices. It's one of many new class action lawsuits consumers can potentially join to seek legal recourse for unfair business practices.
Lawsuit Details
Queens resident Anna Tollison filed a federal class action lawsuit against Subway Restaurants Inc. in New York, alleging significant misrepresentation in their sandwich advertising. The legal complaint centers on the chain's Steak & Cheese footlong subway sandwich, which allegedly contains "barely any steak" compared to promotional images.
The lawsuit presents several specific claims against Subway:
Advertisements depict sandwiches with approximately 200% more meat than what customers actually receive
Marketing photos show meat stacked as high as the surrounding hero bread
The disparity is causing financial damages to consumers, particularly concerning during times of high food prices
Tollison purchased the Steak & Cheese sandwich in August for $7.61 through Subway's mobile app. The lawsuit seeks certification to represent thousands of New Yorkers who ordered the sandwich from October 28, 2021, to the present. The plaintiff is pursuing damages of $500 for each sandwich purchased under New York's Deceptive Acts and Practices Act. It's one of many open class actions and class action settlement claims consumers can potentially receive payouts from.
The complaint extends beyond the immediate cost of the sandwiches, noting that customers incurred additional expenses through travel costs and delivery tips. Similar complaints have emerged regarding other menu items, including the Cheesy Garlic Steak sandwich, suggesting a broader pattern of alleged misrepresentation. This type of false advertising and deceptive marketing is coming under increased regulatory oversight.
Consumer Impact
The lawsuit highlights broader concerns about consumer trust in food advertising during a period of economic strain. With inflation and rising food prices affecting household budgets, misleading food advertising particularly impacts lower-income consumers struggling financially.
Consumer trust in fast-food chains has evolved significantly in recent years. Trust ratings across major chains show varying levels of consumer confidence:
Chick-fil-A leads with 55% trust rating
Panera follows at 40%
Subway maintains 38% consumer trust
Chipotle holds 35% trust rating
Research indicates that consumers increasingly rely on visual cues and packaging labels when making purchasing decisions. The growing demand for transparency in food production has led to 45% of consumers showing willingness to try alternative food options, compared to just 27% in 2018.
The impact extends beyond individual purchases, as consumers incur additional costs through delivery fees and travel expenses to restaurant locations. This situation particularly affects those who make purchasing decisions based on advertised food quality and credence attributes that cannot be verified before purchase. Deceptive practices prey on consumer trust.
Subway's History with Legal Challenges
The sandwich chain's legal history reveals a pattern of consumer-related challenges. In 2013, Subway faced scrutiny when a viral social media post showed their "Footlong" sandwiches measured less than 12 inches, leading to a class action settlement that was later dismissed as "utterly worthless" by the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. This case was an early example of class action lawsuit california consumers bringing against the chain.
A significant ruling came from Ireland's Supreme Court, which determined that Subway's bread contained 10% sugar by flour weight, five times higher than the legal limit of 2% for classification as bread. This decision affected the company's tax status and sparked international debate about product ingredients.
Recent years have brought additional challenges:
A dismissed lawsuit claiming Subway's tuna products contained non-tuna ingredients
The New York Times investigation finding no tuna DNA in tested sandwiches
718 legal actions against franchisees in a single year, surpassing all major competitors combined
These legal battles have impacted Subway's operations, leading to hundreds of store closures across the United States. The company's response to these challenges has typically involved defending its products while implementing operational changes, such as removing controversial ingredients like azodicarbonamide following public pressure. However, customer complaints persist regarding the chain's business model, terms and conditions, and alleged unfair competition practices.
Legal and Industry Implications
The fast-food industry faces increasing scrutiny over advertising practices, with multiple chains defending against similar legal challenges. A pending lawsuit against Burger King in federal court in Miami mirrors the current Subway case, while similar actions against McDonald's, Wendy's, and Taco Bell were dismissed last year.
Historical cases have set significant precedents in the industry. In 2011, Taco Bell defended against allegations that its beef contained only 35% meat, leading to marketing efforts to maintain consumer trust. Notable cases include:
McDonald's 1992 hot coffee lawsuit, resulting in 700 injury complaints and policy changes
A 15-year legal battle in England over McDonald's marketing practices
KFC's supplier controversy in Shanghai affecting international operations
The current legal landscape reflects heightened consumer awareness and stricter advertising standards. Attorney Anthony Russo describes the Subway case as "an egregious example of the type of advertising we're trying to stop.” This lawsuit, combined with similar actions across the industry, suggests a growing trend toward more rigorous scrutiny of fast-food marketing practices and their impact on consumer trust. Regulatory bodies are taking notice of alleged false advertising.
Conclusion
This subway class action lawsuit represents more than a dispute over sandwich portions. The allegations of misrepresented meat quantities strike at the heart of consumer trust during challenging economic times, while raising fundamental questions about food advertising accuracy. Consumer reliance on visual marketing materials makes these claims particularly significant, especially when inflation affects purchasing decisions and food costs strain household budgets.
Fast-food industry advertising practices face increasing scrutiny through legal challenges across major chains. Subway's latest legal battle adds to a growing collection of cases that shape advertising standards and consumer protection measures. These developments signal a crucial shift toward greater accountability in food marketing, potentially leading to stricter industry standards and improved transparency for consumers. Customers have options to join lawsuit actions to hold companies accountable and potentially receive class action payouts.